Things I Learned in 4460

·      Network! Network! Network!

·      “If the public thinks you have a problem… Guess what? You have a problem.”

·      Never tweet that you won’t be in class due to bad weather, a slight cold, lost contacts, sick hamster etc., etc.

·      There is such a thing as a dumb question i.e. “Today we are learning about phone pitches.” 5 minutes later… “What are we learning today?”

·      People over 50 DO tweet.

·      Bourbon and wine can cure anything

·      Always have a full fridge and beer during winter weather warnings

·      Twitter is the place for breaking news- especially for #untj

·      Don’t put anything on the internet you wouldn’t want your grandmother or grandkids to see

·      Be a leader- being hard on your group doesn’t make you a Nazi.

·      NO “No Comment”

·      Word Nerd: Someone fascinated with learning and using new words

·      Grammar Gremlins: Are you smarter than a 5^th grader?

·      Social Media is always evolving along with traditional media, not against it.

·      When Kentucky wins, we all win.

·      Check your e-mail thoroughly and often- forward to the appropriate address if need be.

·      Procrastination Assassination: If you procrastinate you will wish you were dead.

·      Taco Bell’s meat is real: Don’t believe everything you read!

·      If you hate talking on the phone- change your major.

·      It’s not who you know it’s who knows you.

·      TweetDeck will transform Twitter into something new, exciting and completely different. It’s addictive.

·      Classes really do last for 3 hours.

·      Senioritis is 10 times more intense in college and 20 times more inconvenient.

·      If you can’t find your classmates after a big assignment go to Fry Street- everyone’s there.

·      A pitch can be thrown (away).

·      Paper bleeds.

·      Time Management: Turnitin is the ultimate authority on the outcome of your grade.

·      Grades come when they come.

·      If you ever find time to get bored, are stuck at school during a tornado watch and/or sudden hurricane @samjb’s office is the place to be.

-Alisha Mychele

The Hedonic Calculus

 This semester in Ethics, Law and Diversity in Strategic Communications I learned to look at situations not only from a moral and business standpoint but an ethical and legal standpoint as well. More often than not, when people look at an issue they are only concerned with the legalities of the situation. I now know that just because something is legal doesn’t make it ethical. There are many instances when something is legal but is not ethical such as the instance with Cracker Barrel. Cracker Barrel not only refused to hire homosexual employees they fired those on staff that were “out” and/or that they assumed to be homosexual. Although this was a legal act it was unquestionably unethical.

Before taking this class I assumed that if something was illegal it had to be unethical as well but this is not always the case. Something can be deemed illegal from a utilitarian standpoint but still be ethical for the most part. The different case studies we presented in class showed both sides to this. Whether it was the Dove Real Beauty Campaign, the PETA Holocaust Campaign or the Toyota Runaway Prius case they all opened our eyes to a different outlook on the situation.

This class also gave me a clear position on the different Codes of Ethics in the industry: public relations, marketing, WOM, advertising, everything journalism related. I feel I am walking away with a better understand of advertising and the codes of ethics associated with the field. Before I enrolled in the class I never considered advertising to be the most ethical field of journalism and it didn’t cross my mind that they might have a code of ethics as well. I now find myself looking at situations from an ethical standpoint and considering the different ethical dimensions and theories. I now have the hedonic calculus bouncing in my head or was that a utilitarian thought?

-Alisha Mychele

Because I am a Journalism Student...

As I was surfing the Internet today I stumbled upon a news article titled "Restaurant gives Fla. toddler sangria, not juice;" which caught my eye for obvious reasons. As I was reading the article, which was very short, I quickly noticed the formatting and sentence structure was not correct and that it was actually very confusing. Even after reading it I was still not completely sure what the 5 W's and H of the story were. I ended up having to form my own conclusions about what happened and made an overall decision that the story was useless.

Coming to this realization is what made me search for the author of the story and what I found left me very disappointed. The article was distributed by none other than Associated Press- the bible of the journalism industry. The fact that they would publish something so poorly written, confusing and with bad grammar to boot is unthinkable.

Not only that but the article has been shared with over 3,000 people on Facebook and over 30 on Twitter, which who knows how many times the article has been retweeted since. If such a reputable and influential company can actually publish something like that, allow it to go to press and put it on the Internet where any and everything is capable of going viral then anything goes at this point. The AP Stylebook is a symbol of journalism, show it to any journalist and they will know what it is and how to use it. One would think that as a company Associated Press would take more pride in the work that they put out to the public. Especially, since to some people they represent the field of journalism and journalism standards. Perhaps they need a bit more PR on their team.

Besides the fact that the story is terrible as a whole, it is actually quite shady (which might be attributed to the confusing formatting). It's not too clear whether they have their facts straight and if I were the editor (or Professor Bufkins) I would have definitely done some fact checking of my own before the story was published. If the story wasn't interesting on its own there would be absolutely no purpose in releasing such a poorly-written article. I didn't get any information past the headline.
　

McElroy Blasts Tiger on the Field

Rory McElroy recently blasted Tiger Woods in the media while playing messenger in a statement that Tiger Woods is so washed up that he should be on Celebrity Apprentice, according to AOL’s Sporting News Feed. The young, talented golf pro has been taking low blows in the media and is not, in the least, worried about being disproven. 

Rory didn’t actually make the statement his self but the 21-year-old played cub reporter for Sports Illustrated and claimed that Tiger would never again be the dominant force he once was in the sport. Being that, at one time, Tiger won nine tournaments in one season, nobody except Tiger would agree to disagree on the assumption. To add fuel to the fire Ian Poulter predicted that Woods wouldn’t even finish in the Top Five this week. 

Woods replied, “Poulter is always right isn’t he?” When asked if we have seen the best of Tiger Woods he icily replied, “No.”

Woods proved his worth after he golfed a 71 on Thursday, he now has the chance to either golf a 65 or miss the cut altogether. Woods didn’t give in to the pressure but seeing McElroy leading, of course, has to be slightly more irksome than say, Hiroyuki Fujita.

“I’d rather be where Rory is,” was all Tiger said while looking at the scoreboard. He once was where Rory was.

This is understandable being that before all of the endorsements, fame and, more recently, call girls Tiger was once considered the God of Golf. In 1997, Tiger destroyed the field and became the youngest person to ever win a Masters. McElroy now owns the title for being the youngest first-round leader in Masters history. The young golf master recently won third both at the British and PGA World Tours, not long after, he led Europe to a Ryder Cup win. 

If Tiger doesn’t come back and win to this 21-year-old soon to be Golf champion this could be a serious PR fail on the Woods part. Not only has he lost major credibility with his recent rendezvous with girls outside of his marriage but his game, the reason he’s famous in the first place, has been considerably off point. The fact that someone new is coming in, winning and challenging what was once a golf legend is something to be talked about. Tiger Woods has both a lot to prove and a lot to disprove in the weeks to come, hopefully he can pull through.

For more info: http://aol.sportingnews.com/sport/story/2011-04-07/rory-mcilroy-tugging-on-supermans-cape-and-getting-away-with-it-tiger-woods?icid=maing-grid7|main5|dl3|sec1_lnk2|55069

BP Execs Not Likely to Face Criminal Charges

According to a recent Bloomberg News report the U.S. Justice Department is considering filing manslaughter charges in its investigation of BP’s oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The report played prominently enough in the media on Tuesday to drive BP’s share price down a noticeable amount.

An analysis of industrial disasters by University of Maryland law professor Jane Barrett shows that company managers are very rarely charged in industrial accidents to include bigger disasters than the recent explosion of the Deepwater Horizon rig, which resulted in 11 fatalities.

“If they are large corporate entities, what has happened historically is the company pleads guilty, pays a fine and no individuals are prosecuted," Barrett said in an interview with AOL News. "The bigger the company, the less likely there will be individuals held accountable."

Just six years ago, in 2005, BP’s Texas City refinery exploded resulting in 15 fatalities and more than 170 injuries. BP pleaded guilty and paid more than $130 million in criminal, civil and administrative fines and still no one was charged with any offense.

"How the Justice Department handles this case is going to be important," Barrett said.  She has spent two decades prosecuting environmental cases for both the Justice Department and the state of Maryland. "If they are able to prosecute individuals, they'll send a message that a large corporate criminal find won't shield culpable individuals from prosecution."

From both a PR and law standpoint this situation is a disaster for BP. The threat of the government targeting specific individuals in corporations is a PR/law nightmare. Up until recently the courts never charged people for disasters because it was thought that they were simply doing their job to the best of their abilities. That premise is not going over too well in today’s eco-friendly age.

The BP oil spill has been one of the biggest to date as well as one of the most talked about events of the decade. The oil spill injured millions of aquatic life, ruined lives and resulted in the deaths of both people and animals. It is interesting to look at the oil spill from a PR point of view since it is the epitome of a crisis for such a huge corporation. Even with that being the case criminal charges on individuals from companies are usually tough cases to make.

 "In a lot of situations, it's hard to find somebody above the level of line employees who has that knowledge that would make them liable," says Steve Solow a former federal prosecutor who previously headed the Justice Department's environmental crimes unit. "Is it right to go after someone just doing their job as well as they could, when the issue is far more complex and broader than what their job presented?"

This will remain to be the question in the case to come and will undoubtedly be the defense for both the company’s PR and legal counsel. If they are charged it will be a landmark case and one of the biggest rulings of our time.

-Alisha Mychele

For more information go to http://www.aolnews.com/2011/03/30/will-bp-execs-face-criminal-charges-in-gulf-oil-spill-not-likel/

Black Swan

The Oscar award winning movie Black Swan is being investigated for a “cover up”. The professional dancer who worked as Natalie Portman’s stunt double in the movie has claimed that she is a victim of a cover up and that Portman only did about 5% of the dancing in the movie. The seasoned ballerina told Entertainment Weekly magazine that the film and producers are misleading the public about the amount of dancing Portman did.

It was not disputed by anyone that Lane performed the complicated dance sequences and fancy footwork and allowed the filmmakers to digitally graft Portman’s head onto the body.

Black Swan producer and Portman’s fiancé, Benjamin Millipied, commented in L.A. Times earlier this week. "There are articles now talking about her dance double [Lane] that are making it sound like [she] did a lot of the work, but really, she just did the footwork, and the fouettés, and one diagonal [phrase] in the studio," he disputes. "Honestly, 85 percent of that movie is Natalie."

Lane did admit that she was never promised any specific billing for her role but was disappointed to see herself barely credited and only acknowledged as “hand model,” “stunt double,” and “Lady in the Lane,” (a brief walk on role). Lane also claims that the movie’s producer Ari Handel asked her not to discuss her work with the press.

"They wanted to create this idea in people's minds that Natalie was some kind of prodigy or so gifted in dance and really worked so hard to make herself a ballerina in a year and a half for the movie, basically because of the Oscar," Lane told Entertainment Weekly.

This issue is relevant to public relations in a couple of different ways. For one, it could be considered a small crisis when it comes to the credibility of the movie. Black Swan has won several awards and has been regarded highly in the world of entertainment. Part of the reason for this is the amazing dancing throughout the film and Portman’s ability to transform the role of the modern ballerina and become relatable. For someone to come out and say that it was actually them working in the movie and not Portman that is definitely a problem.

Another issue is the producer telling the stunt double what to discuss with the media. The fact that he said this makes me wonder if they were actually trying to cover something up but on the same note it’s her word against the filmmaker or studios.

Lastly, Portman was just involved in the recent drama with John Galliano of Christian Dior. The fact that her name is again being brought up in some kind of scandal or controversy is not a good look. Both the pr  for Black Swan and Portman should be pretty busy in the upcoming months.

-Alisha Mychele

And the results are in… you have a problem.

If I take anything away from my pr/communications classes this semester it will be Professor Bufkins’ popular quote: “If the public thinks you have a problem, then you have a problem.”

I couldn’t agree with this more and lately I have been finding myself, to my horror, quoting it and applying it to real life situations. For example, the other day my ex-boyfriend and I were having a disagreement about another disagreement and why and where we disagreed in the first place. As the convoluted “misunderstanding” continued on I found myself looking at the situation in hindsight and, for the most part, remembering what had taken place. I rolled my eyes and mumbled, louder than I intended, “if the public thinks you have a problem, then you have a problem.”

I was mortified. Why in the heat of the battle am I even thinking about quotes from school? And PR quotes at that? I couldn’t even manage to think of a scholarly, mysterious quote, to at least leave him guessing, but instead something about public opinion and problems. It was then that I realized that public relations has taken over my life.

I eat, sleep, breathe and dream about the profession that I have not even stepped foot in yet, not completely at least. I always wonder how people devote their whole life to their career, love the life they live at work more than the one at home and live for the grind. I always wanted to see the people behind the scenes, the brains of the operation, so to speak.

After taking years of journalism classes, doing numerous projects, shadowing, volunteer work, working and doing everything else I can make time for, I now realize that it becomes a way of life for most. After a while, the hectic schedules become so second-nature that you don’t even realize it anymore.

Public relations is more than a career for most practitioners, it’s around-the-clock, it’s a lifestyle. It’s not hard for people that are truly passionate about their career to live it because they love what they do. The people that are successful in the field are successful because they chose to be. You have to work to make a good career out of this profession, even if an opportunity is handed to you, you have to grind to not only prove yourself but to prove the value of public relations itself.

PR is doubted, underestimated, frowned upon and misunderstood. The public assumes the profession is all about spin and damage control and twisting arms for your clients. PRSA’s next task should be to start a public relations campaign for the profession itself; to dispel the rumors and show that there are ethical practitioners in the field. To set an example for what public relations should be like and warn people of what it shouldn’t.

Codes of Ethics

I found it somewhat surprising to see all of the codes of ethics, perhaps besides advertising, to be somewhat similar. They all illustrate the importance of honesty, advocacy, fairness, disclosure, independence etc. this is understandable being that we are in the field of journalism and have a loyalty to our various publics and stakeholders.

I did think it important to note that the advertising code of ethics, although it was somewhat along the same lines as the more journalistic codes, was a bit different since they are more along the sales standpoint of journalism.

Instead of harping on disclosure, advocacy and independence their ethics were more along the lines of prevention. They were focused on preventing things from happening by stating the importance of being proactive instead of reactive. The advertising ethics were taste and decency, not making deceptive claims and being able to substantiate evidence efficiently to name a few.

I did find it surprising that advertising has the AAF code of ethics. Although, I never really thought too much about it I always assumed that advertising was more of a free for all considering all of the commercials with fine print you see in the media, specifically on TV.

In the back of my mind, I have always considered advertising to be somewhat of a deceptive practice. If I consider all of the advertising examples that come to mind they are always deceptive such as used car salesman or the TV ads that urge people to text 22334 to receive some type of promotion; only to read the fine print at the bottom and find that it will automatically charge you a monthly $9.99 fee for 5 pictures or an illegitimate app that doesn’t actually work.

I guess you could say I am a skeptic, although I do not doubt that people feel the same way about the major I have chosen: public relations. So many people are surprised to find out that people actually go to school for the field and that there are ethical standards and accreditations that must be followed by those choosing to take the ethical route.

Public Relations as a whole gets a bad wrap in the media. Usually it is only thought about during some kind of crisis and/or bad exposure a company or person has recently ran into but so many fail to realize that public relations is also, more often than not, the reason why that company or person has gotten to the point they are at now.

The codes of ethics in journalism as a whole whether it be public relations, news editorial or broadcasting is followed by ethical professionals and most codes can be applied across the board; even the advertising codes of ethics, if tweeked, can successfully be applied to the more journalistic fields of news editorial and public relations.

I found all of this to be interesting considering that we are all in a field that people find hard to trust. Codes of ethics must be followed to instill trust in our publics and stakeholders.

-Alisha Mychele

More info can be found at:

http://www.aaf.org/default.asp?id=37

http://www.marketingpower.com/AboutAMA/Pages/Statement%20of%20Ethics.aspx

http://ethicaladvertising.blogspot.com/2008/03/advertising-code-of-ethics.html

http://www.prssa.org/

http://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp

Portman v. Galliano

Anti-semitic rant puts Galliano in bad light.

Dior. Everyone in the fashion world knows something if not a great amount about the power house brand and its founder the late Christian Dior. The name has become synonymous with luxury worldwide. Which is all the more reason why the latest developments about designer John Galliano have been so shockingly offensive.

Dior designer Galliano has really been pushing the envelope lately and it’s looking like it might be pretty hard to come back from at this point. This weekend during the 2011 Oscars Natalie Portman’s new TV ad for the perfume Miss Dior Cherie aired concurrently with Galliano’s offensive anti-semitic video being blasted on the Internet.

The contents of the video almost instantaneously threw him into a quandary being that Portman, the new spokesperson for the perfume, is proudly Jewish. Portman was born in Jerusalem, is an active supporter of Jewish causes and in 2003 she received the Israel Cultural Award.

Once in 2005 Portman disclosed to author Abigail Pogrebin that “Being Israeli has become a much bigger part of my identity in recent years because it’s become an issue of survival.”

Portman also described a close friend that has grasped the “European, anti-Israel way of thinking, and it’s [been] very hard to have conversations with him.”

Only time will tell how the video of Galliano’s rant will affect her relationship with one of the world’s top fashion houses.

“I love Hitler!” Galliano proudly declared in the video apparently drunk at the La Perle brasserie in Paris. He continues on to say to those filming the exchange, “People like you would be dead today. Your mothers and forefathers would be (expletive) gassed.”

To top it all off Galliano allegedly assaulted a couple in a café late last week in Paris, which resulted in his arrest and subsequent suspension by the fashion house.

Portman was prevented from answering how she felt about the designer’s comments when asked in the backstage pressroom after her Best Actress Academy Awards win by the event moderator. This is understandable from a Public Relations perspective because the answer, understandably, could be detrimental both to her career and her current position as spokesperson for the line.

This situation is a nightmare from a public relations standpoint for all parties involved those being Portman, Dior and, of course, Galliano.

The situation with Portman would understandably be a very sensitive one, unavoidable, and she must take the situation into perspective. She must also take her values into consideration and decide if she really wants to represent a line with people such as Galliano working for them. Even though he has been reprimanded the fact of the matter is that he did not just develop these views over night and that he is a talent Dior has harped on for years.

Dior, on the other hand, cannot ignore this situation and they may lose a very big part of their fan base if they don’t take the correct measures toward fixing the situation. Jewish people have historically been very wealthy and undoubtedly purchase Dior, or did. The Public Relations professional for Dior must be ready to hold their hand at this point and make sure nothing else is said that might harm the lines reputation.

Finally, Galliano should probably hire a small PR army to fix this one. He has been off the handle (no pun intended) and has offended a remarkable amount of people with his rants. It is sad that such a great talent is violently self-destructing in such a manner. What makes it harder is that he probably does not even care and keeping him from making any other offensive comments will probably be a job in itself. Galliano has been a hero in many eyes and has disappointed so many of his loyal fans. Only time will tell if he can come back from this.

-Alisha Mychele

For more information:

http://www.stylelist.com/2011/02/28/natalie-portman-vs-galliano-his-anti-semitic-rant-on-video/

http://fashion.telegraph.co.uk/columns/hilary-alexander/TMG8353397/John-Galliano-fallen-idol.html

To Shoot or Not to Shoot That is the Question

 When you see this name you automatically think, guns, school and death. These words are, understandably, unsettling to any parent or student and automatically spark people to think the next word: protection.

Over the years there have been numerous public shootings resulting in people searching for ways to keep their loved ones safe and protected should they ever end up in such a life altering situation.  The debate over whether to allow guns on campus is raging on and the public and its opinions has been extremely divided over it.

Students and professors at Texas public universities may soon be able to carry concealed weapons on campus. More than half of the states members of the House of Representatives have signed on as co-authors of the new measure. Eight other states: Mississippi, Nebraska, Florida, New Mexico, Michigan, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Arizona (which currently allows concealed hand guns just about anywhere) have “campus carry” legislation pending as well according to David Burnett, director of PR for Students for Concealed Carry on Campus.

“The point that I would impress on these campuses is that we are talking about former military, ROTC cadets, professors and other mature adults that went through state mandated requirements, exercises and fingerprinting. Not those with violent crimes, alcohol abuse or mental issues,” says Burnett of the pending legislation.

The intended safety reform has not been met without its criticism. The Campaign to Keep Guns off Campus currently has 275 schools in 36 different states staying true to its initiative to keep colleges, and schools in general, as gun-free zones.

According to Andy Pelosi, executive director of the campaign, the decision could most definitely influence where parents decide to send their children to college.

It is not unlikely that the legislation will pass. In 2009, the Senate passed a similar bill pertaining to gun control and was not met with nearly as much opposition. This difference is understandable when you consider that college campuses are brewing with large groups of diverse people that hold many different viewpoints.

The issue of gun control has always been a hot topic in our country. Even currently people believe that Obama will soon enforce gun control laws even though he has never explicitly stated this, nor implied it, in any of his speeches.

This brings me to believe that PR for many different advocate groups, both for and against, gun control must be bustling right now. Whether you are for or against gun control everyone has an opinion and has something to say. These advocate groups must have someone representing them and speaking on behalf of their beliefs if they desire to further their efforts.

Regardless of what their PR representatives think about the situation they must be objective and keep the best interest of their client at heart. There is, without a shadow of a doubt, PR professionals working for companies that have beliefs that are unparalleled to their own. The main focus of a PR professional is to keep their organization afloat and to do the best job they can while pushing their personal beliefs aside.

For more information refer to:

 http://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-finance/2011/02/23/states-consider-allowing-guns-campus/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/college-candy/university-of-texas-stude_b_827167.html

http://www.concealedcampus.org/

 

The Potter Box: Acting Ethically

 The Potter Box is useful for solving many different problems and ethical issues, even those not related to the field of public relations. Professor Bufkins introduced a case study to the class Wednesday that required us to use the Potter Box to solve an ethical issue relating to an intern at a company and what she was being asked to do. It did not take much to see that the issue was not an ethical one, the Potter box is not always used to see whether or not an issue is ethical but instead it is used to analyze the issue and, eventually, come to an action or decision.

A while ago, Professor Bufkins told the class a story about a girl that used the Potter Box to analyze her current relationship and decide whether or not she should break up with her boyfriend. I found this to be a really good example of using the tool in real life and it showed me another way to apply the things I learn in class to real life issues. Class work does not always have to be boring and if utilized in real life it helps students to get an actual grasp on how to use it in their future career fields.

I find more often than not that unethical practices evolve more out of being careless and not thinking things through than from people actually being unethical. If people actually take the time to sit down and analyze an issue and take it step by step as the Potter box does for you then they will see the impracticalities of acting unethically and would find a better way to go about the situation.

When making a decision you must first define the situation. What are the facts of the case? What is the actual problem you are trying to solve? After finding the answers to these questions establish the values related to the situation both negative and positive. What values are being put on the line? Which ones are you not willing to sacrifice? Next, loyalties must be outlined; state where your loyalties lie and determine all stakeholders that might be affected by your actions, both good and bad.  Lastly, ask yourself what are the principles of the situation? Identify competing principles and determine which ones are most important to you, the company and/or the situation. After you have done all of this you should very well be able to come to an action or decision and act accordingly.

By explicitly stating these things and getting your ideas down on paper it is much easier to see the bigger picture and grasp the situation for what it really is. What we have learned about the Potter box has shown me that instead of just coming to what I believe to be the best action or decision regardless of the situation, I need to sit down and actually analyze the situation. After the analysis the decision I make will be much better thought out.

-Alisha Mychele

Chrislam

Soon to be or an exaggeration?

Muslims and Christians alike are speaking out, both negative and positive, about the recent trend and socialization of the two religions, Islam and Christianity. Recently, Christian entities have been allowing traditionally muslim religions to practice in their churches due to construction and/or the overcrowding of Muslim worship areas and it has not been met without criticism. So it made me wonder, is it wrong for one religion to allow another to practice in their worship centers despite different beliefs? Is there such a thing as extending a helping hand too far? Far enough to undermine the very beliefs that the building was founded on?

Most people, of all religions, would say yes. The very point of a congregation building a church or place of worship is to worship the one and only God they believe in more than anything. A church is supposed to be one of the most sacred places to the members so to let another religion worship their Gods in the very house of their one and only God would, understandably, be insulting to most. 

From the beginning of all recorded history, people, specifically Muslims and Jews, have been fighting over Israel-the Holy Land. Soldiers and citizens alike have sacrificed and lost their lives over the Holy War or what is better known worldwide as Jihad. The very thought of people practicing Christianity in Muslim temples and vice versa, in any other country but America, would be unimaginable and would never happen.

In the words of Dr. Alex McFarland: “We as the church are called to show love, we're called to help. But to let a building simultaneously be used for the activities of a mosque and also the activities of Jesus Christ, it's just incompatible. And I think it's one more example of political correctness and hyper-tolerance gone awry."

So I ask from a PR standpoint is this incompatible?

How do you explain to your stakeholders that you are allowing another entity practice in the place that they have paid to have built? 

Would two opposing PR companies enable each other to practice in the same office? Would Pepsi and Coca-Cola practice in the same building allowing its brand to be blurred, confused and, eventually, be converted into a blurred-purpleversion of Pepsi-Cola?

Based on what I’ve learned up until now in PR there’s no way that would ever happen. Doing that would be the very risk that PR practitioners would advise against and do anything to prevent. 

At the end of the day people must always take into consideration the sacrifices people before them have made for them to be in the position they are now in. As we speak, people are now losing their lives over the Holy Land and the right for people to practice the religions they believe in in their places of worship. Respect must be given to those who came before us and sound decisions must be made off of what has happened in the past.

-Alisha Mychele

 “Chrislam” - a combination of the two faiths that essentially ignores the big white elephant in the room: the exclusive claims of both Christianity and Islam.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/02/18/churches-open-doors-muslim-worship/#ixzz1EMxwg3W2

The Internet Loses Egypt

February 11, 2011- Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak resigned today and handed the country over to the Egyptian military sending the country into cries of happiness and excitement. After 30 years of autocratic rule the country will now have a chance at democracy and elect a new President. The 250,000 protestors in Cairo gleefully honked their horns, waved flags, danced the conga and chanted “Egypt is Free! Egypt is Free!” The footage and relieved looks of the Egyptians helped me to realize just how blessed we are to live in a country where we are free to do pretty much anything we choose- free to determine our own destiny.

The biggest part of the controversy arose on Friday, January 28, when President Mubarak shut down internet access to and from the country not only banning the Egyptians from using the internet and sending information out but banning other countries from sending information into Egypt. How the country did something of this magnitude is unclear but the government does own the country’s two major ISPs and it has been reported that they started by closing down the major routers. These routers direct traffic over the border and by being shut down would initially shut the country out from each other and the rest of the world then officials switched off individual routers to shut off individuals. Officials immediately cut off access to social networks such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube and banned restriction to all Egyptian websites from outsiders and all websites to Egyptians.

The ethicality of this issue is very clear- shutting down the Internet to prevent news and complaints from getting in and out of an entire country is entirely unethical and, until this point, unimaginable to most. The idea of the internet of a global village, being able to connect to anything and anyone around the world, is what makes the Internet so unique and widely used. What happened in Egypt could not have continued on for much longer and it was clear that something had to give. I am happy to see that the country’s citizens can now sleep peacefully, be at ease and re-connected with the rest of the world.

-Alisha Mychele

Alishamychele.blogspot.com

http://www.aolnews.com/2011/02/11/egypts-military-backs-hosni-mubarak-cairo-protests-spread/

Black Voices

Today when looking online for a substantial blog topic for this week I found a section entitled “Black Voices” on AOL and decided to look further into it; being that I am Black and that it is February- Black History Month. What I found on the main page was a bit disturbing and disappointing. I found several stories about rappers, singers, a murderer and something about Malcolm X’s family feuding over his estate. The issue with this is there are so many legit articles on AOL’s main page but when it comes to the main page of the Black Voices section there are only stories about entertainment figures and people that aren’t of any educational interest to anybody- not just Black people.

It bothers me that we are in the year 2011 and, still, the main things connected to Black people are music, sports and basically anything entertainment wise- even during Black History Month. Black people have done so many great things for the nation such as inventing the door knob, AC units, clothes dryers and even cell phones (where would we be without that?!) and I feel they should be given more credit.

It leads me to believe that although we are so far removed from the way things used to be, such as minstrel shows and using Black people only for the entertainment of others, that we still have a long way to go. Despite the fact that we have elected a Black man into the White House I feel that Black people will always have to go the extra mile to be taken seriously and that when something goes wrong they will be criticized more harshly than someone that is of Caucasian decent.

Black entertainment figures have been idolized to the point that Black children are no longer looking at magazines and saying they want to be an inventor, a lawyer, a doctor, a revolutionist but instead they want to be rappers, singers, gang-bangers and sports stars. It’s rare that Black children can turn on the TV and see someone that looks them doing something legit and respectable but on the opposite side of the spectrum White children can always find someone to look up to on the big screen.

At this point what it all comes down to is choices. We must teach our children to choose to take the right path and lead by example. They must choose to be the next lawyer, the next entrepreneur and the next President of the United States on their own and the best that we can do at this point is lead by example.

-Alisha Mychele

http://www.blackvoices.com/?icid=navbar_bv_main5